Rascal scoring please

[beEZq2]

We need Rascal scoring for this game. It is a lot more strategic, balanced and less punishing. The original scoring makes no sense because it is too chaotic. You can win or lose 100 points in a single round. Rascal scoring is much more competitive and is simpler to understand too. At least give us the option of using it for those of us who wish.

[Progged]

YES YES YES! Please, we have probably gone through 6 decks of this game at our table (family favorite) and we use the Rascal scoring. Would be nice to do it with a virtual table!

[MathCT]

This will not be implemented. Sorry.

[TheHippo]

Another vote for rascal scoring. I think the Skull King scoring is too erratic or it should be weighted i.e if I bid only 1 in round 10 it is technically more difficult to achieve then a a bid of 3 or 4, but getting it correct only earns you 10 points!

[T72on1]

Another vote for rascal scoring. I think the Skull King scoring is too erratic or it should be weighted i.e if I bid only 1 in round 10 it is technically more difficult to achieve then a a bid of 3 or 4, but getting it correct only earns you 10 points!

Why would that be more difficult? It all depends on the cards you and the other players get.

[leo35]

Yes I agree with you I think it's a very good way to compt !!!