Player skipped a third player 94% completion and cost me a win

Forum rules
Please DO NOT POST BUGS on this forum. Please report (and vote) bugs on : https://boardgamearena.com/bugs
Groovenstein
Posts: 24
Joined: 24 July 2025, 04:46

Player skipped a third player 94% completion and cost me a win

Post by Groovenstein »

Would I be violating some written or unwritten rule by outing this person? I was easily winning, and the skipped player had not been playing excessively slow.
User avatar
Meeplelowda
Posts: 3833
Joined: 14 March 2020, 10:31

Re: Player skipped a third player 94% completion and cost me a win

Post by Meeplelowda »

Groovenstein wrote: 03 November 2025, 22:45 Would I be violating some written or unwritten rule by outing this person?
Yes you would. The site does not require someone to be winning when they expel a player. The site doesn’t care if in your opinion they weren't playing too slowly. [some would say running out of time is excessively slow by definition] The third player ran out of time. Period.

Giving this player a red thumb is your remedy.
Play Now lobby 4ever! https://boardgamearena.com/lobby
Groovenstein
Posts: 24
Joined: 24 July 2025, 04:46

Re: Player skipped a third player 94% completion and cost me a win

Post by Groovenstein »

Meeplelowda wrote: 03 November 2025, 23:10 Yes you would. … Giving this player a red thumb is your remedy.
Would you kindly cite the rule for my review?
User avatar
Meeplelowda
Posts: 3833
Joined: 14 March 2020, 10:31

Re: Player skipped a third player 94% completion and cost me a win

Post by Meeplelowda »

Groovenstein wrote: 03 November 2025, 23:20
Meeplelowda wrote: 03 November 2025, 23:10 Yes you would. … Giving this player a red thumb is your remedy.
Would you kindly cite the rule for my review?
Please do not use the Forums to call players out by name, this is what the Moderation Reports are for. The Forums should remain a general discussion. If you misuse the Forums in this manner, we will apply moderation penalties.
Play Now lobby 4ever! https://boardgamearena.com/lobby
Groovenstein
Posts: 24
Joined: 24 July 2025, 04:46

Re: Player skipped a third player 94% completion and cost me a win

Post by Groovenstein »

Meeplelowda wrote: 03 November 2025, 23:25
Groovenstein wrote: 03 November 2025, 23:20
Meeplelowda wrote: 03 November 2025, 23:10 Yes you would. … Giving this player a red thumb is your remedy.
Would you kindly cite the rule for my review?
Please do not use the Forums to call players out by name, this is what the Moderation Reports are for. The Forums should remain a general discussion. If you misuse the Forums in this manner, we will apply moderation penalties.
While I wholeheartedly disagree with any argument that what this person did was anything other than super gross, I’m grateful for your citation and will, like The Dude, abide. Thanks!
User avatar
Jellby
Posts: 3546
Joined: 31 December 2013, 12:22

Re: Player skipped a third player 94% completion and cost me a win

Post by Jellby »

Meeplelowda wrote: 03 November 2025, 23:10 Giving this player a red thumb is your remedy.
Yes, but red-thumb the player who ran out of time, that's the one who "ruined" your game.
Groovenstein
Posts: 24
Joined: 24 July 2025, 04:46

Re: Player skipped a third player 94% completion and cost me a win

Post by Groovenstein »

Jellby wrote: 04 November 2025, 17:35Yes, but red-thumb the player who ran out of time, that's the one who "ruined" your game.
Not a prayer. There are plenty of legitimate reasons a person could run a hair over time on a particular turn. There are no legitimate reasons to steal an arena win from a non-offending player the instant that option is available without so much as a word.
User avatar
Jellby
Posts: 3546
Joined: 31 December 2013, 12:22

Re: Player skipped a third player 94% completion and cost me a win

Post by Jellby »

Why should they settle for a 2nd place when they could (legally) get tied 1st?
Ceaseless
Posts: 1303
Joined: 12 November 2022, 17:06

Re: Player skipped a third player 94% completion and cost me a win

Post by Ceaseless »

Groovenstein wrote: 03 November 2025, 22:45 Would I be violating some written or unwritten rule by outing this person? I was easily winning, and the skipped player had not been playing excessively slow.
How could they have skipped a player that wasn't playing excessively slow? Any player skipped would have to have violated the time restrictions as well as any additional time to wait for someone to manually check and finally skip them.
Groovenstein
Posts: 24
Joined: 24 July 2025, 04:46

Re: Player skipped a third player 94% completion and cost me a win

Post by Groovenstein »

Ceaseless wrote: 04 November 2025, 20:34 How could they have skipped a player that wasn't playing excessively slow? Any player skipped would have to have violated the time restrictions as well as any additional time to wait for someone to manually check and finally skip them.
Who is playing slower: someone who uses maximum time every turn, or someone who uses half time every turn but goes over one second on a turn late in the game? Not that that’s precisely what happened here, I’d have to review the tape, but I trust you take my point.

Perhaps more on point, someone who goes 1 mph over the speed limit is speeding, but would you describe that person as driving excessively fast? In most cases, probably not.

But whatever “excessively slow” means, let’s assume for the moment that a person going over a time limit on one turn qualifies. Do you think the appropriate response is for a player who cannot win the game to skip that player immediately, at the first available opportunity and without even saying “hey everything ok?” or “you mind playing a little faster?” thus depriving the winning player (who wasn't even the person out of time) of the benefits of their inevitable win? Does that fall within what you would consider the right thing to do? Would you feel good about that?

It’s bizarre to me, sad really, that the comments thus far have a lot to direct at a person who committed the apparently unpardonable sin of—we don’t even know, thinking too long, having a coughing fit, a pressing issue with their kid, a temporarily choppy internet connection?—going a second over on a clock, and nothing about someone who sleazebagged their way out of an L.

So it goes, I guess.
Post Reply

Return to “Wingspan”