Ran the Dice Rolls thru a spread sheet.... RE: ORIGINAL GAME REFERENCED
70 Dice rolls = 140 Die Rolls = 23.3 should be 1's + 23.3 should be 2's etc.
As Totals.... 0 should be 1's + 2 should be 2's + 4 should be 3's +
6 Rolls should Total as 4's + 8 should be 5's + 10 should be 6's +
12 should be 7's + 10 should be 8's + 8 should be 9's + 6 should be 10's +
4 Roils should Total as 11's + 2 should be 12's
BIG ANOMALIES = 22 x 7'S 189% OF NORMAL +++
14 x 6's 60% OF NORMAL + AS COMBOS 4 x 6's 41% OF NORMAL
14 x 1's 60% OF NORMAL +++
0 x 11's 0% OF NORMAL
_______________
ARE THESE VARIANCES FAR OUT OF BOUNDS ??? Hmmmmm......
AFTER RUNNIN STATS ON 40 GAMES... THIS GAME HAS PERHAPS THE GREATEST VARIANCE...
ANSWER THE Q...!!! IS IT FAR OUT OF BOUNDS ??? Hmmmmm.....
ANSWER: IT SEEMS .....drummmrollllll.... LEGIT..... RANDOM.......
AS A STAND-ALONE GAME ... IT DOES NOT PROVE ANYTHIN ??? Hmmm....
[OK- SOME ROUNDING THERE... 72 ROLLS IS MUCH MORE EASY TO FIGURE THAN 70 ROLLS]
_________________
WHAT WOULD QUICKLY SEEM FISHY... IF ANY PARTICULAR NUMBER EXCEEDS 150% OF NORMAL ....
SAY.... 4 OUT OF 6 GAMES...
NOW THAT WOULD CAST DOUBT ON RANDOMNESS....
___________________
TO DISCOVER LESS OBVIOUS BIAS - WOULD REQUIRE RUNNIN STATS ON.... SAY 300 GAMES...
I'M OUT....
70 Dice rolls = 140 Die Rolls = 23.3 should be 1's + 23.3 should be 2's etc.
As Totals.... 0 should be 1's + 2 should be 2's + 4 should be 3's +
6 Rolls should Total as 4's + 8 should be 5's + 10 should be 6's +
12 should be 7's + 10 should be 8's + 8 should be 9's + 6 should be 10's +
4 Roils should Total as 11's + 2 should be 12's
BIG ANOMALIES = 22 x 7'S 189% OF NORMAL +++
14 x 6's 60% OF NORMAL + AS COMBOS 4 x 6's 41% OF NORMAL
14 x 1's 60% OF NORMAL +++
0 x 11's 0% OF NORMAL
_______________
ARE THESE VARIANCES FAR OUT OF BOUNDS ??? Hmmmmm......
AFTER RUNNIN STATS ON 40 GAMES... THIS GAME HAS PERHAPS THE GREATEST VARIANCE...
ANSWER THE Q...!!! IS IT FAR OUT OF BOUNDS ??? Hmmmmm.....
ANSWER: IT SEEMS .....drummmrollllll.... LEGIT..... RANDOM.......
AS A STAND-ALONE GAME ... IT DOES NOT PROVE ANYTHIN ??? Hmmm....
[OK- SOME ROUNDING THERE... 72 ROLLS IS MUCH MORE EASY TO FIGURE THAN 70 ROLLS]
_________________
WHAT WOULD QUICKLY SEEM FISHY... IF ANY PARTICULAR NUMBER EXCEEDS 150% OF NORMAL ....
SAY.... 4 OUT OF 6 GAMES...
NOW THAT WOULD CAST DOUBT ON RANDOMNESS....
___________________
TO DISCOVER LESS OBVIOUS BIAS - WOULD REQUIRE RUNNIN STATS ON.... SAY 300 GAMES...
I'M OUT....