Asteroid Mining Consortium

Forum rules
Please DO NOT POST BUGS on this forum. Please report (and vote) bugs on : https://boardgamearena.com/bugs
rambling_coherently
Posts: 85
Joined: 18 May 2025, 09:25

Re: Asteroid Mining Consortium

Post by rambling_coherently »

FollowFolklore wrote: 10 February 2026, 10:00 It's not just Asteroid Consortium. There are lots of cards that literally break the game in 1v1. I have no idea why you would play Mars with 2p other than casually.
This is certainly an opinion.
User avatar
FollowFolklore
Posts: 8
Joined: 25 November 2023, 13:42

Re: Asteroid Mining Consortium

Post by FollowFolklore »

Yeah, an objective opinion. Imagine wasting 40 minutes of your life on a game that is mainly decided by who gets the most S-tier cards. Mars wasn't even balanced for 2p, but I don't really want to argue with arena players, you guys clearly have a specific mindset that starts with "a".
User avatar
xspuipuke
Posts: 221
Joined: 13 July 2021, 16:51

Re: Asteroid Mining Consortium

Post by xspuipuke »

Then tell us which player count you think to know this game was designed for.
stillframe
Posts: 42
Joined: 23 December 2025, 21:11

Re: Asteroid Mining Consortium

Post by stillframe »

The designer has stated that the game was designed around 3-4 players. Card balance makes this fairly evident in any case.
User avatar
PleaseAGB1
Posts: 42
Joined: 16 July 2025, 17:59

Re: Asteroid Mining Consortium

Post by PleaseAGB1 »

I opine card / corporation balance varies across player counts, sure; I don't see anything in the design that screams to me 'this was designed for 3p or 4p'. Sure all the attack cards are weaker in any non 2p game; some cards and corps are stronger in 3p+ than 2p -there's nothing I can see that points to the game being designed for 3p+.

Of course, I am a Frylexus (spelling?) so perhaps somewhere they have stated this opinion on the game.
badookbun
Posts: 3
Joined: 08 August 2025, 02:06

Re: Asteroid Mining Consortium

Post by badookbun »

FollowFolklore wrote: 10 February 2026, 10:00 It's not just Asteroid Consortium. There are lots of cards that literally break the game in 1v1. I have no idea why you would play Mars with 2p other than casually.
you have 600+ games with a 53% wr at 200 elo...Statistically even if you have every S tier card you will struggle to beat good players, maybe focus on your gameplay rather than venting at supposed balance issues that you aren't good enough to properly understand.
User avatar
PleaseAGB1
Posts: 42
Joined: 16 July 2025, 17:59

Re: Asteroid Mining Consortium

Post by PleaseAGB1 »

I'd opine we are better off debating opinions on the game regardless of the ELO rating of the people in the discussion... but hey, internet is internet.
FrankJones
Posts: 2441
Joined: 30 June 2024, 00:24

Re: Asteroid Mining Consortium

Post by FrankJones »

Agreed. FollowFolklore is correct, there are some imbalanced cards, especially in 2-player.

That said, the game still plays well with 2 players and is often the preferred player count.
ArchDevious
Posts: 69
Joined: 09 October 2023, 23:05

Re: Asteroid Mining Consortium

Post by ArchDevious »

So what is the minimum elo and winrate you need to be able to complain about balence issues in the forurms?
User avatar
xspuipuke
Posts: 221
Joined: 13 July 2021, 16:51

Re: Asteroid Mining Consortium

Post by xspuipuke »

0—an argument from authority is a logical fallacy.
Post Reply

Return to “Terraforming Mars”