Please do NOT implement this as a default behaviour. Tournament organizers can use Swiss style tournaments to prevent matches running in parallel if that is important to them. As a tournament organizer and player, the parallel feature for round-robin tournaments is very desirable to me. However, like Zwack_42, I will avoid RR tournaments with too many players. For me, my cutoff is 11 players (10 games each) - I don't enter RR tournaments with more than 11 players, and I don't create RR tournaments with more than 11 players.Zwack_42 wrote: ↑21 February 2026, 14:43 Also, for round robin type tourneys, I would love to have the games start consecutively, instead of all at the same time. If I understood correctly, that has not been possible to set up previously, and is still not possible. I find it a bit confusing to have a 10 or more matches of the same game running in parallel, and therefore I have largely avoided RR tourneys.
If this feature is considered for implementation, it should be implemented as an option controlled by the tournament organizer during creation. Then, organizers and players can make decisions that work for them.