Not a fan of the new design, and even less so regarding the rather churlish reply to the criticism.
It is interesting to read the perspectives of players who are colour blind or visually impaired, with several suggesting it has made things worse.
I manage a team in the elearning / digital learning industry and was motivated by the post telling all of us users that we didn't know better than the developers and publishers to do a little more digging.
Interestingly, it looks as though 4 of the 5 colours fail the minimum Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) standards. To meet the standards, the text on the white backgrounds of the cards should have a contrast ratio of 4.5:1 for normal text. The numbers in the top corners of each card fail to meet this value. So not particularly accessible.
Added to this, as others have mentioned, the rescaling of the page is very jarring. Interaction animations should be limited as much as possible unless the user can control it to prevent harm or visual fatigue.
I'm adding all of the above as whilst I support the effort to improve accessibility, I was deeply unimpressed with the reply posted which essentially said users couldn't possibly know better than anyone involved in the redesign.
I would love to see the feedback taken onboard and a solution or improvement found.
It is interesting to read the perspectives of players who are colour blind or visually impaired, with several suggesting it has made things worse.
I manage a team in the elearning / digital learning industry and was motivated by the post telling all of us users that we didn't know better than the developers and publishers to do a little more digging.
Interestingly, it looks as though 4 of the 5 colours fail the minimum Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) standards. To meet the standards, the text on the white backgrounds of the cards should have a contrast ratio of 4.5:1 for normal text. The numbers in the top corners of each card fail to meet this value. So not particularly accessible.
Added to this, as others have mentioned, the rescaling of the page is very jarring. Interaction animations should be limited as much as possible unless the user can control it to prevent harm or visual fatigue.
I'm adding all of the above as whilst I support the effort to improve accessibility, I was deeply unimpressed with the reply posted which essentially said users couldn't possibly know better than anyone involved in the redesign.
I would love to see the feedback taken onboard and a solution or improvement found.