please correct this game name

[ExaltedAngel]

Sigh, what even is the point of making another thread? The OP knows they're lying; we know they're lying. It's just sad. It's not like this is their first day on BGA and they don't know any better. It's not like they have any legitimate points or bothered discussing it with anyone. They're just spewing the same lies and ignoring anything contradicting them, indicating they know they're lying and never had any intention of actually discussing the subject. They just want to spam the same nonsense over and over.

If I dont have any legitimate points to prove this is a rigged game,
what is your legitimate points to prove that it is not a rigged game?
Did you have the open source code?
You just can't 100% conclude that I made a wrong claim.
Prove me I am wrong by making it a non-premium game. That's it.
Please dont ignore anything contradicting you.

The burden of proof lies with the one making the claims. Anything else is bs.

And no, it's not about being tyrants, it's about being sick and tired of having half the posts on the forum be this kind of crap with no interesting content, no evidence of anything, no logical sense, no common sense, nothing.

Oh, btw, I'm not premium

[jerjerjaii]

Prove me I am wrong by making it a non-premium game. That's it.
Please dont ignore anything contradicting you.

How would making it non-premium prove anything?

No, you’ve already proven yourself wrong. The simple fact that you keep playing shows you know you are lying, and this post tells us why: you’re just bitter it got turned premium.

Then there’s also your already-stated 51% winrate—I can’t help but notice you ignored that post contradicting you, which (as you are non-premium and therefore must play against premium users) conclusively proves that lack of “rigging” in favor of premium players.

Finally, consider that the BGA game framework doesn’t even provide games with a way of knowing who’s premium and who isn’t. How can a game be rigged in favor of premium players if it doesn’t know who they are?

So yeah, we can 100% conclude you’ve made a wrong claim, and furthermore can conclude you don’t even believe your claim, which makes your posts lies and slander.

I don't even know how you can see I have 51% win rate. I got only 140 win in 327 tables.
YOU ARE THE ONE WHO ARE MAKING FAKE CLAIMS.

Also, how the heck you come up with the statement "the BGA game framework doesn’t even provide games with a way of knowing who’s premium and who isn’t. How can a game be rigged in favor of premium players if it doesn’t know who they are?"
funny a$$. just like 'they receive the money but don't know who pay'. What is this nonsense.

I wonder if you ever gone to middle school.
If yes, I feel pathetic for your teachers for such retarded debate
Come up with better opinion please

[jerjerjaii]

Sigh, what even is the point of making another thread? The OP knows they're lying; we know they're lying. It's just sad. It's not like this is their first day on BGA and they don't know any better. It's not like they have any legitimate points or bothered discussing it with anyone. They're just spewing the same lies and ignoring anything contradicting them, indicating they know they're lying and never had any intention of actually discussing the subject. They just want to spam the same nonsense over and over.

If I dont have any legitimate points to prove this is a rigged game,
what is your legitimate points to prove that it is not a rigged game?
Did you have the open source code?
You just can't 100% conclude that I made a wrong claim.
Prove me I am wrong by making it a non-premium game. That's it.
Please dont ignore anything contradicting you.

The burden of proof lies with the one making the claims. Anything else is bs.

And no, it's not about being tyrants, it's about being sick and tired of having half the posts on the forum be this kind of crap with no interesting content, no evidence of anything, no logical sense, no common sense, nothing.

Oh, btw, I'm not premium

"The burden of proof lies with the one making the claims."
I make this claim based on my multiple games. This is my evidence.
You think my evidence is bs, so please provide your evidence that the game and the dice is fair.
SO WHERE THE F IS YOUR EVIDENCE? OPEN SOURCE CODE? YOU COME UP AND OPPOSE ME WITH YOUR OWN BELIEF, WITHOUT CONCRETE EVIDENCE.
If the game is completely fair dice, we don't even need this forum to discuss anything because it is completely random.
You dont F-ing need strategy or "interesting content" because the dice is fair.
Take you crap back and give evidence that it is a fair game but premium players have better win rate.

[BarnardsStar]

I don't even know how you can see I have 51% win rate. I got only 140 win in 327 tables.
YOU ARE THE ONE WHO ARE MAKING FAKE CLAIMS.

Please take the time to educate yourself instead of flinging your poo around the room. BGA winrate is normalized so that winning in 3- and 4-player games counts more than winning a 2-player game. It’s harder to do that, after all. This makes winrate comparable between people who only do 2p and people who only do 3p: 50% is average. If you are above 50% you are doing better than average. You have won multiple instances of 3p Can’t Stop and even some 4p, so your win rate is in fact now 52%.

Also, how the heck you come up with the statement "the BGA game framework doesn’t even provide games with a way of knowing who’s premium and who isn’t. How can a game be rigged in favor of premium players if it doesn’t know who they are?"

Again, I did the research. The API is available, the source code to this game is available, you can look. BGA knows who pays, of course, but the game does not.

You still haven’t answered my two questions: if you know it’s rigged, why keep playing? And how would making the game non-premium change anything? And I’ll add a third: why don’t you just go premium yourself to enjoy the benefits? (I’m guessing it’s because your parents won’t let you use their credit card.)

[Dreamy T]

Mouhaha....
I already knew the joke, it's an old one !

[Dreamy T]

If I dont have any legitimate points to prove this is a rigged game,
what is your legitimate points to prove that it is not a rigged game?
Did you have the open source code?
You just can't 100% conclude that I made a wrong claim.
Prove me I am wrong by making it a non-premium game. That's it.
Please dont ignore anything contradicting you.

When you loose a game, it only proves that you didn't win it. Oh, look there up in the sky, Russel is having tea !

[Tisaac]

"The burden of proof lies with the one making the claims."
I make this claim based on my multiple games. This is my evidence.

Let me give you a real answer.

paid players get 2/12 finish in one round.
non-paid players get no moves with 6,7,8 after third roll.

Source = trust me bro

[ExaltedAngel]

I make this claim based on my multiple games. This is my evidence..

That's not an evidence. I quote from Wikipedia: "In science, scientific evidence is information gained through the scientific method that confirms or disconfirms scientific hypotheses, acting as a neutral arbiter between competing theories."

Yours is just an opinion (this is a fact). And it's most likely bs (this is my opinion).

[fiscused]

I've found that the dice act exactly this way when I'm playing the physical game on the tabletop. They will not let me win but the very same dice will let my opponent (who just so happens to own the game) win!

Three conspiracy theorists walk into a bar....you can't tell me that was a coincidence!

[thg0724]

paid players get 2/12 finish in one round.

If you are on 2-7-8, you are over 30% to complete a column if you roll until you finish a column. Maybe some players are aware of this and run them up, giving themselves a chance to complete a column in one turn. I seldom encounter a player who is willing to roll once they have already advanced two spaces on 2 (or 12). I'd guess the stop rate is over 95%. (Of course, they are much better than 30% to complete the 2 column once they have already advanced two steps, so people must not be trying to complete the column in one turn often enough.)