Minimum six?

[BruceGee]

I used to love playing these puzzles solo. I would take a break from work to spend a few minutes solving a puzzle, then get back to whatever I was doing on my computer.
Who on earth thought it was a good idea to eliminate "1" as an option for how many games to play? Now I can't play fewer than six. I don't want to play six games in a row -- it's fun, but it's not that fun! If I quit after one game, I'm pretty it will affect my reputation negatively. If I can't just do a single puzzle, I'm going to be a lot less interested in playing this fun game!

[peaceful-gorilla914]

You can always choose turn based as an option, with a lomg thinking time. Then you can decide when to play your next turn. You sould have a few days to finish the game.

[YoannLevet]

Although Gamme Logique is a true solo game in its physical version, I wanted the digital adaptation to have a genuine competitive aspect.

That's why I chose to require a minimum of six games. With fewer games, I feel that luck would have too much influence on the final ranking, and I wanted the leaderboard to reward consistency rather than a single good performance.

If a lot of players asked for a single-game option, I wouldn't have any problem implementing it in the future. I'm always open to feedback and suggestions.

That said, constructive feedback is much more likely to lead to changes than hostile demands.

Yoann

[dite0963]

Yoann , you could restrict the 1 and 3 options to only in friendly mode , so for friendly mode , there are 1,3,6,9,12,20 ; for ranked games , only 6,9,12,20 . That will be fine .

[YoannLevet]

Ok, I will do that.

Yoann