There is literally no reason for the restriction of not being able to concede a single-elimination 2-player game. It slows down tournaments and it is awful to endure.
One might argue that banning conceding in swiss/groups/etc. makes sense as the game might use margin of victory as a tiebreak (which is awful and should not be the case anyway, use chess tiebreaks, they even are depreciating margin of victory in this summer's World Cup because there is growing understanding that it is bad and game-distorting) but in the single-elimination it literally changes nothing whether people forfeit, time out, or grind the game to its inevitable conclusion.
Seems like a change that could be implemented with a single line of code (removing the block if the game is 2-player and single-elimination).
One might argue that banning conceding in swiss/groups/etc. makes sense as the game might use margin of victory as a tiebreak (which is awful and should not be the case anyway, use chess tiebreaks, they even are depreciating margin of victory in this summer's World Cup because there is growing understanding that it is bad and game-distorting) but in the single-elimination it literally changes nothing whether people forfeit, time out, or grind the game to its inevitable conclusion.
Seems like a change that could be implemented with a single line of code (removing the block if the game is 2-player and single-elimination).