No, I strongly disagree with that suggestion. Seaofgreen is known among regulars as the 'master of table creation'sourisdudesert wrote: ↑15 September 2019, 17:14Fun fact: on the 3 last days there have been an average of 400 tables of 6 nimnt played each day on BGA... which is exactly the same average than in the previous month.seaofgreen wrote: ↑15 September 2019, 17:05 Yes I quit my membership immediately with the new interface. It used to take me 5minutes plus to fill a table of 6 for 6nimmt. Now it takes me over 20minutes and most of the time I just quit.
BGA isn't worth it anymore. Most likely I won't play here anymore soon.
There may be a perception difference, you may have been unlucky on a table, but what the statistics says is that there is no problem like you are suggested.
I think you confuse the total number of tables and the number of tables where regulars meet. The first may not have dropped, the second has (at least that is the opinion of a number of 6 nimmt! regulars). I think it would be smart to use the regulars knowledge to further improve the site rather than dismissing their feedback
As it is, the new site caters more to casual players, players who play a lot of different games (and just drop in whatever game is available) and players of the more popular games (for instance players of 7 Wonders where tables fill up very quickly after opening them).
Hey, that's pretty cool. Thanks! Could you sort the list according to rating?sourisdudesert wrote: ↑15 September 2019, 17:14Well, it looks like they are backTimbamania wrote: ↑15 September 2019, 16:56 One big thing I find is missing is the list of available players. For games that are less popular it helps to know how many players there are available (and what their level is).![]()