I usually play in a "competitive" way to some games... and I really fail to understand how Arena mode, as it is, is the competitive mode. I rather trust Elo.
At least in the simple mode I can choose the game I want and play with opponents with a high Elo. That seems more competitive than playing against a somehow random player to a somehow random game.
Am I missing something?
This is a bit puzzling... Let's take chess as the gold standard:Basically, with the new Arena mode, you should not care too much about your ELO anymore. Think about these examples:
_ National Soccer teams do not care too much about their "FIFA rank", while they do care about winning the World cup.
_ Best Chess players do not care too much about their ELO, while they do care about being FIDE World Champion.
_ ... and so on.
- Rules are well-defined.
- Usually standard chess is played and not any variant.
- Times are well-defined: blitz, classic, etc.
- You know your opponent beforehand.
- A tournament has the same rules every time.
- Rules are NOT well-defined: I simply see " Number of players and game settings are fixed for each Arena season." and I do NOT know which expansions or settings will be used.
- You do NOT play standard Carcassonne, you might end up play something different.
- As before, NOT well defined, I do not know.
- Unknown opponent (I guess this one is understandable).
- Different rules for each Arena season.
At least in the simple mode I can choose the game I want and play with opponents with a high Elo. That seems more competitive than playing against a somehow random player to a somehow random game.
Am I missing something?