he fToo many lines in trame to buy ressource to other player

[CaKtus]

When I have a Trading Post, I might sometimes buy a brown resource for 2 gold from a weaker opponent instead of for 1 gold from the leader. In that way I deny money (which is flexibility and points) to the leader - I have better position to become a leader myself. It's very rare (1 in 25 games), but it happens once in a while.

This is very true.

The remaining question would be, are you allowed to give 2 gold instead of 1 to the same player for the same good (by not using a Market card for example) ? i guess not

[ObiQuiet]

When I have a Trading Post, I might sometimes buy a brown resource for 2 gold from a weaker opponent instead of for 1 gold from the leader. In that way I deny money (which is flexibility and points) to the leader - I have better position to become a leader myself. It's very rare (1 in 25 games), but it happens once in a while.

Yes, that case makes sense, giving to different players. But there may be no reason to show both "pay 2 to PlayerA" and "pay 4 to PlayerA" as options.

[Tadachini]

The remaining question would be, are you allowed to give 2 gold instead of 1 to the same player for the same good (by not using a Market card for example) ? i guess not

No, this is against the rules.

Yes, that case makes sense, giving to different players. But there may be no reason to show both "pay 2 to PlayerA" and "pay 4 to PlayerA" as options.

If you see such option, please let me know (ie post a screenshot). It does't make any sense and mast be a bug.

[ObiQuiet]

I did see it in this game table=110563079 (commented on it to the other players, though not with the in-game chat). I'll grab a screenshot if I see it again.

[Tadachini]

I did see it in this game table=110563079 (commented on it to the other players, though not with the in-game chat). I'll grab a screenshot if I see it again.

Can you tell me which turn? I need to check what kind of cards and wonder stages you had built by then.
Here is a replay link https://boardgamearena.com/archive/repl ... s=87526800;


EDIT: no need, faced it myself in another game.

[6element]

This is a valid situation / NAB. Let's say you have a split or Caravansary, a Forum, and a Trading Post. You need two brown resources as well as two grey ones to build a card. Now you have a choice how to use split / Caravansary / Forum and you are allowed to use them inefficiently. Nothing in the rules forces using them in the most optimal way.

[6element]

Agreed, this was a very good improvement. But, under what conditions (other than generosity) would you need the option to pay more to the same player(s)? Curious if there is a reason?

Like you expect the 2nd opponent is experienced enough to bury green on the last turn (so Halicarnassus cannot get it from discard) and want to make sure they have enough money to do so?

[Tadachini]

Ok, I have submitted a patch to BGA to fix it. If you look at my screenshot above, option 3 makes no sense as there is option 1. Choosing 3 would mean you are king making a player. So once my patch is approved, such trade options will no longer appear. Nice catch ObiQuiet!

[6element]

Sorry, but this is totally wrong "fix" and against the rules. It is possible that you're helping yourself (to win) by helping player 2 against player 3.

Please revert it.

In general, it is worrisome and upsetting that you alone can decide what to change in the client (including breaking the game rules) without vetting from community / site owners, especially taking pushing for controversial cheatbot P* into account.

[Tadachini]

Sorry, but this is totally wrong "fix" and against the rules. It is possible that you're helping yourself (to win) by helping player 2 against player 3.

Fair point, you might give a specific person more coins for a purpose.

In general, it is worrisome and upsetting that you alone can decide what to change in the client (including breaking the game rules) without vetting from community / site owners, especially taking pushing for controversial cheatbot P* into account.

What a worrisome and upsetting world you are living in, right?