Meeplelowda wrote: ↑19 September 2021, 09:19
_Razz_ wrote: ↑19 September 2021, 07:27
People have been moderated for saying "wolf" in a werewolf game (No, I am NOT kidding) .. so apparently ANYTHING is moderation worthy.
Further details are needed. If the player was a wolf and was outing other wolf in a situation that didn't warrant it, then yes, that can be an offense. It might be considered game throwing in the Wolvesville (formerly Werewolf Online) app.
If it was any other role calling someone a wolf, then moderation is broken.
By the way, moderation was discussed in the ask-me-anything stream they did several days ago. I'd suggest checking that out (I don't have a timestamp).
I think you have no idea what you are talking about, sorry

)))
I think the idea expressed above was the simple use of the word itself, nothing involving which role accusing which role. (Some further details would be ok, but let's face it... it sounds very probable that a thing like this would happen - such moderation, in a WWs game, on this site)
As for your idea... let's say a ww calls another ww a "wolf", but after fake claiming The Fortune Teller. Or a ww lover of a villager, trying to get rid of the other WWs, or a simple ww trying to get the village's confidence.
So all these accusations are strategy-wise, and because of the last case mentioned, one can never be accused of game-throwing, to justify such moderation; i really think it's about the word "wolf" itself, like when a player some time ago was moderated for addressing to another player who had the username "this_b***h". Moderated for... saying the username, after some awesome player reported.
Because of this, your defence, in my opinion, has 0 logic.