Re: The Majority of Time I go Second
Posted: 27 December 2023, 22:39
Yeah, today I have been 1st about half the time, it not more then half. It seems like for a run of games I was 2nd most of the time. Thanks for validation.
Yeah, today I have been 1st about half the time, it not more then half. It seems like for a run of games I was 2nd most of the time. Thanks for validation.
No one said you can't type in bold. However, bold text is conventionally used for emphasis:
If the entirety of text is emphasized with a modification of font, by definition the modification cannot serve as emphasis because there is no longer anything setting it apart.The most common methods in Western typography fall under the general technique of emphasis through a change or modification of font: italics, boldface and small caps. Other methods include the alteration of LETTER CASE and spacing as well as color and *additional graphic marks*.
Even if they did, I still suspect there'd be forum posts where people then just disputed that the statistic was correct. If you really think you're getting a rough deal by being second all the time, and playing on the site isn't fun because of this, then don't play. If you actually think it's a bug and want to improve the site by reporting it for fixing, then do some proper research with a large random sample (like at least 100 games) and show that the chance of going first is significantly different to 50-50 (and raise it as a bug).MANNY-OLIVIA wrote: ↑27 December 2023, 21:05 The Number of Games as First Player should be displayed in a Player's Statistics.
It's not BGA rules, it's common standards for how to use different types of text as Meeplelowda said. As they also said, you can type in bold if you wish. But it reflects on you - honestly, typing in all bold or all caps tends to make you appear aggressive, like you're constantly shouting. If you don't care about others thinking that of you, carry on.MANNY-OLIVIA wrote: ↑28 December 2023, 00:16 Maybe BGA should have rules for typing on this site now!
What part of "[n]o one said you can't type in bold" was vague or ambiguous?MANNY-OLIVIA wrote: ↑28 December 2023, 00:16 Maybe BGA should have rules for typing on this site now!
There is no contradiction. No one has yet said you cannot use bold. They have pointed out that it is unconventional. You are responding to an argument no one made.
Listen, you do you. You can be as "eccentric" as you want, but it doesn't make you immune from people calling it out. Like I said, I think you enjoy the attention, so I blame myself for engaging in this instead of using the forum tools available to block it.MANNY-OLIVIA wrote: ↑28 December 2023, 02:05 We can't all be conventional.
I'm not the one who started criticising how I write.