Why? Spend the resources improving the quality of the games you have instead making such a redundant offering.
TEXAS HOLD’EM: Deal Me In!
- Frosti_Austi
- Posts: 12
- Joined: 20 April 2020, 01:01
Re: TEXAS HOLD’EM: Deal Me In!
Layout is bad. Communal cards (flop) should be horizontal. Why do we have to crane our necks to see the numbers? Also, all the cards (river) should be displayed on the same screen. I shouldn't have to scroll down to see the 4th and 5th card. Just common sense. Won't play this rendition until it's fixed. Thanks for putting in the chest though!
-
ElloryQueen
- Posts: 4
- Joined: 10 August 2023, 01:39
Re: TEXAS HOLD’EM: Deal Me In!
If you don't think poker is fun, then don't play it. There are plenty of other games to play and enjoy. I like that there are card games here that I can play along with board games to have a variety of table top fun!
- FDHenneberg
- Posts: 162
- Joined: 27 July 2025, 16:09
Re: TEXAS HOLD’EM: Deal Me In!
I might agree if this was the way BGA works. At least all newer games aren’t developed by BGA people, but by volunteer or freelance developers, the latter being paid not by BGA, but by the publisher. As there is obviously no one willing to pay for developing Texas Hold’em, we can be quite sure that this is the work of a volunteer dev. So nobody really gains anything if this wasn’t on BGA.Lucy Tania wrote: ↑03 January 2026, 03:11 Why? Spend the resources improving the quality of the games you have instead making such a redundant offering.
Regrading comments about gambling: We’ve got Koi Koi and Go Stop on BGA for ages. These look way nicer than poker and at least to me, are way more fun, but it’s classical gambling stuff as well. Bluffing is a part of many board games, as is auctioning.
- Mathew5000
- Posts: 661
- Joined: 02 January 2021, 01:41
Re: TEXAS HOLD’EM: Deal Me In!
Seems like this game spent five years in alpha and beta. It's a poor implementation and as far as I can tell, none of the feedback in the following forum thread was taken into account before bringing this game out of beta: https://boardgamearena.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=34601
Re: TEXAS HOLD’EM: Deal Me In!
Very disappointing to see this type of game here. There’s plenty of better places to play this sort of game.
- Lucy Tania
- Posts: 10
- Joined: 07 March 2016, 03:25
Re: TEXAS HOLD’EM: Deal Me In!
Yes, but this is why BGA sucks. Owners lean on volunteerism and take 0 responsibility for qualityFDHenneberg wrote: ↑03 January 2026, 07:03I might agree if this was the way BGA works. At least all newer games aren’t developed by BGA people, but by volunteer or freelance developers, the latter being paid not by BGA, but by the publisher. As there is obviously no one willing to pay for developing Texas Hold’em, we can be quite sure that this is the work of a volunteer dev. So nobody really gains anything if this wasn’t on BGA.Lucy Tania wrote: ↑03 January 2026, 03:11 Why? Spend the resources improving the quality of the games you have instead making such a redundant offering.
Regrading comments about gambling: We’ve got Koi Koi and Go Stop on BGA for ages. These look way nicer than poker and at least to me, are way more fun, but it’s classical gambling stuff as well. Bluffing is a part of many board games, as is auctioning.
- FDHenneberg
- Posts: 162
- Joined: 27 July 2025, 16:09
Re: TEXAS HOLD’EM: Deal Me In!
While I’d never see or word it the way you do, I see that a lot of things aren’t optimal on BGA. Some of them, like releasing a game that apparently (didn’t check that myself) still has several known bugs, can and should be criticized no matter what, but I think everyone should take into account that the general approach with a mix of development paid for by the publishers and development by volunteers is what makes free accounts possible and what keeps fees for premium at a level that I consider an absolute bargain.Lucy Tania wrote: ↑03 January 2026, 18:14
Yes, but this is why BGA sucks. Owners lean on volunteerism and take 0 responsibility for quality
- Meeplelowda
- Posts: 3828
- Joined: 14 March 2020, 10:31
Re: TEXAS HOLD’EM: Deal Me In!
I just read that entire thread. It seems that not only did the dev not know the game well enough to understand why certain requests were essential, but also the same applies to whoever made the decision to move it out of beta.Mathew5000 wrote: ↑03 January 2026, 07:40 Seems like this game spent five years in alpha and beta. It's a poor implementation and as far as I can tell, none of the feedback in the following forum thread was taken into account before bringing this game out of beta: https://boardgamearena.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=34601
Play Now lobby 4ever! https://boardgamearena.com/lobby