When you get moderated they don't even tell you why it is you have been moderated or what exactly you did wrong. There is no type of reference or anything to assess your so-called wrong doing. This is a bit disorganized, in my opinion. BGA should tell you the reason for moderation if you have been chat banned. Otherwise their is complete chaos as anyone can be moderated for any random thing.
For instance, I got chat banned for a day and BGA could not even give me a single reason why. I emailed them and they couldn't come up with anything.
I sent them a follow up email and still nothing. So what was the purpose of moderation? I would assume a purpose would be so the offense does not happen again but if there is no offense, then what is the actual purpose. Perhaps BGA should change the person in charge of responding to emails or put more than 1 person in charge if they cannot even respond to emails from continued supporters. To simply ignore genuine emails is very unprofessional.
For instance, I got chat banned for a day and BGA could not even give me a single reason why. I emailed them and they couldn't come up with anything.
I sent them a follow up email and still nothing. So what was the purpose of moderation? I would assume a purpose would be so the offense does not happen again but if there is no offense, then what is the actual purpose. Perhaps BGA should change the person in charge of responding to emails or put more than 1 person in charge if they cannot even respond to emails from continued supporters. To simply ignore genuine emails is very unprofessional.