Moderation because collusion... from other guys

[OrkaNet]

*Moderation Edit: please do not use the Forums to call out specific tables or players by name, this is what the Moderation Reports are for. The Forums should remain a general discussion. Forum rules prohibit using the Forums to cchallenge your moderation penalty.
https://boardgamearena.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=26665

[ufm]

Checked the game record...

- This game was the first encounter of the three players you mentioned. They are clearly NOT friends who play as a group.
- Many trade suggestions were rejected among the three players. Especially, cetik failed to trade even once.
- Can't find any evidence of foul play in attacks as well.

Imo your punishment is just.

[OrkaNet]

Checked the game record...

- This game was the first encounter of the three players you mentioned. They are clearly NOT friends who play as a group.
- Many trade suggestions were rejected among the three players. Especially, cetik failed to trade even once.
- Can't find any evidence of foul play in attacks as well.

Imo your punishment is just.

Are you looking for the good 2 players ?

They are friends in the game...

They have played more 50 catan games together... After and before

[ufm]

If you think so, you should report them with enough evidence and/or give a red thumb, instead of blaming in the chat.

[Ceaseless]

Checked the game record...

- This game was the first encounter of the three players you mentioned. They are clearly NOT friends who play as a group.
- Many trade suggestions were rejected among the three players. Especially, cetik failed to trade even once.
- Can't find any evidence of foul play in attacks as well.

Imo your punishment is just.

Are you looking for the good 2 players ?

They are friends in the game...

They have played more 50 catan games together... After and before

50...? I only see 1 game between the players in the game you posted. You talk about the game taking over an hour but the table says it was 55 minutes, which while not far from an hour is still less. Are we looking at the same table? There's a surprising about of disagreement regarding information registered by BGA itself.

[TheClaudeQC]

You talk about the game taking over an hour but the table says it was 55 minutes, which while not far from an hour is still less. Are we looking at the same table? There's a surprising about of disagreement regarding information registered by BGA itself.

The 55 minutes is an estimations based around an average... it can take more or less depending of the speed and strategy of the players.

[Ceaseless]

You talk about the game taking over an hour but the table says it was 55 minutes, which while not far from an hour is still less. Are we looking at the same table? There's a surprising about of disagreement regarding information registered by BGA itself.

The 55 minutes is an estimations based around an average... it can take more or less depending of the speed and strategy of the players.

The game duration is how long the game lasted, it was not based around an average.