Complete mode is much longer than advance, while advance is much longer than simple.
It is unfair to the complete players, because they are playing less games, while facing stronger opponents.
Make several rank list instead of one for tta or set all non-complete games as no-elo may solve the problem.
Some other games also need separated ranking for different modes.
For example, pr. A player good at 1 on 1 pr might not be good at 3+pr (For example, if he look high at big market while look down at factory, like what he does in 2p, he totally fails) If he cares about elo, he will be afraid of 3+ games. So does 4p into 2p, a player can only try new modes in no-elo if he does not want to lose too much.
Even if a player is good at both, 4p is much harder to control, a stupid move of opponent can be an unexpected king making, high-ranked player may win almost every 1 on 1 pr, but no one can do so in 4, while second place is losing a great deal.
On the other hand, if a starter want to learn strategy from watching master's games, a separated rank list helps.
It is unfair to the complete players, because they are playing less games, while facing stronger opponents.
Make several rank list instead of one for tta or set all non-complete games as no-elo may solve the problem.
Some other games also need separated ranking for different modes.
For example, pr. A player good at 1 on 1 pr might not be good at 3+pr (For example, if he look high at big market while look down at factory, like what he does in 2p, he totally fails) If he cares about elo, he will be afraid of 3+ games. So does 4p into 2p, a player can only try new modes in no-elo if he does not want to lose too much.
Even if a player is good at both, 4p is much harder to control, a stupid move of opponent can be an unexpected king making, high-ranked player may win almost every 1 on 1 pr, but no one can do so in 4, while second place is losing a great deal.
On the other hand, if a starter want to learn strategy from watching master's games, a separated rank list helps.