Rule Clarification
Posted: 16 January 2026, 12:12
Hi all,
I had to clarify a rule relating to situations when you lay a shield that joins two or more land parcels controlled by only one opponent. In this instance, one of the men controlling the two shields is returned to the opponent, but the opponent still controls the larger land parcel, hence you, as the player joining the two parcels cannot claim it.
This contrasts the situation where you lay a shield that joins two or more land parcels that are controlled by more than one player. Then all of the men are removed and you can claim the enlarged land parcel.
This rule clarification is part of BGA Rules version 1.4. uploaded today.
I had to clarify a rule relating to situations when you lay a shield that joins two or more land parcels controlled by only one opponent. In this instance, one of the men controlling the two shields is returned to the opponent, but the opponent still controls the larger land parcel, hence you, as the player joining the two parcels cannot claim it.
This contrasts the situation where you lay a shield that joins two or more land parcels that are controlled by more than one player. Then all of the men are removed and you can claim the enlarged land parcel.
This rule clarification is part of BGA Rules version 1.4. uploaded today.