Hey everyone,
I wanted to get the community's thoughts on the ethics and norms of blocking in Ink, specifically in competitive arena.
The Situation:
In a recent game, Player A used their move on the quill wheel to draft a tile that Player B clearly needed to complete/expand a specific color area for an objective. It effectively blocked Player B's progress. Afterward, Player B accused Player A of engaging in "anti-jeu" (anti-play/unsportsmanlike conduct) by blocking them instead of just focusing on their own board.
Because Ink has a completely open, public draft wheel, keeping an eye on what your opponent needs is a visible part of the game state.
The Question:
Where does the BGA community draw the line on this? In a tight or 2-player match, is defensive blocking considered a standard, valid tactical move to stop a competitor? Or do you view it as crossing the line into poor sportsmanship (anti-jeu) when a move is made purely to deny someone else?
Curious to hear how you all approach the social contract of the game!
I wanted to get the community's thoughts on the ethics and norms of blocking in Ink, specifically in competitive arena.
The Situation:
In a recent game, Player A used their move on the quill wheel to draft a tile that Player B clearly needed to complete/expand a specific color area for an objective. It effectively blocked Player B's progress. Afterward, Player B accused Player A of engaging in "anti-jeu" (anti-play/unsportsmanlike conduct) by blocking them instead of just focusing on their own board.
Because Ink has a completely open, public draft wheel, keeping an eye on what your opponent needs is a visible part of the game state.
The Question:
Where does the BGA community draw the line on this? In a tight or 2-player match, is defensive blocking considered a standard, valid tactical move to stop a competitor? Or do you view it as crossing the line into poor sportsmanship (anti-jeu) when a move is made purely to deny someone else?
Curious to hear how you all approach the social contract of the game!