need replay analysis help

[xiaopianzi]

https://boardgamearena.com/table?table=***

can somebody help me to replay analysis for game that ***s reach rank 1 arena over *** during last season end? i want to learn 800 elo player strategy and improve my skill, many player say this is good game to analysis.

some move give me confusion. someone can help me to understand and learn?

***

Edited: please do not use names in your post, even if it is for the sake of learning their strategy.

[vinny_boy]

Fresh account, first post, and somehow you already know about Predator 2 projects, when to time a break, hand size against end-game scoring, and when to deny a university, across 11 timestamped moves. That isn’t someone who just started. Real beginners ask “how do I get money?”, not “why not block the Predator 2 project at move 94?”

Naming players in a public thread to cast doubt on them is also against the forum rules. If you have a cheating accusation, report it to the mods with evidence. Dressing it up as a learning question isn’t fooling anyone.

And maybe stop making alt accounts and try winning a season on your main, fair and square. That would do more for your reputation than this thread.

[xiaopianzi]

i don’t understand, i just ask strategy question for game. I don't have cheating accusation. Why be so defensive?

[yetiks]

This is a pretty desperate attempt at slandering *** imo and is embarrassing, as Vinny said, using an alt just makes it more so.

You and your friends looking for mistakes in Skaldings gameplay should sign up for the next Emu cup, if you do well you can do multiple games against *** and then review your own games collectively and look for any potential mistakes there too.

[yazavats]

i don’t understand, i just ask strategy question for game. I don't have cheating accusation. Why be so defensive?

Your interpretation of him being defensive is part of your projection that there's something to be defensive about. Which only further corroborates that you're posting in bad faith, as if that wasn't obvious enough. You say your intentions are innocuous yet your charade perpetuates toxicity.