I agree that while Frylexus (spelling?) may not have meant this game to be primarily 2p, it definitely interests many (most?) of us for 2p player games. I think the game feels a bit too much 'solitaire side by side' when you play 3p and above, and of course there's plenty of 'kingmaking' with attack cards etc. .aspirin_ wrote: ↑10 August 2025, 11:02 The game was definitely not intended to be best played as a 2p game, but here we are. It's pretty good balanced for it. Definitely better than 4 or 5p.
It's also not high variance and even less the complete opposite. Otherwise you wouldn't have players averaging 80% win rates.
You also overestimate the importance of the opening hand. There are not that many 10/10 and 1/10 hands. It rarely happens that the game is over from the start. Ofc drafting would reduce variance here, which is a good thing, but decision making and skill is far more important than the opening 10.
At the risk of sidetracking an already mediumly side tracked thread; which other games like T mars (so heavy euro? resource management?) have you all found to be good for 3p? 4p? I think the only 3p I have played (I think it's here in BGA) that seems balanced and low kingmaking is Puerto Rico (need to have the optional rules enabled, craftman's angst etc. etc. ).