cheats quoridor

[ophum1234]

The problem is, if anyone from BGA sees your complaint here, you're going to get dinged for naming names.

You have said nothing substantive about the evidence I have provided. Please engage with the evidence provided.

[Ceaseless]

A cursory glance at the top players on arena would show you that the top two players have played 200 games.

It's not a false dilemma.
That means an unnecessary binary choice.
Try to understand the words you use before posting.
I have provided evidence in the thread and informed the moderators.
Your contribution is less than worthless.

A cursory glance at the top Arena player? So we take a look at the top Arena players and check how many games it says they've played on their game page. Let's start with #1, FluffyBunny7, with over 1000 total games of Quoridor. Now, even though 1000 starts with a 1, and 200 starts with a 2, 1000 is actually bigger than 200. So there went that claim.

#1's last game was before you made your post, so it's not like this wasn't true when you posted. But maybe you just didn't see #1, the reigning champion of the previous season. So #3 gets slipped in instead, LMrcx, with over 1600 games. Or maybe you missed them too. #4, SDFSDF has over 16000 games.

A false dilemma is not limited to two choices, lol. If someone says "you said it was a prime number so it's either 3 or 5", them later saying "or 7" won't change it from being a false dilemma. The point of the false dilemma is that it ruled out other viable options, not how many options it left open.

[Strode]

The problem is, if anyone from BGA sees your complaint here, you're going to get dinged for naming names.

You have said nothing substantive about the evidence I have provided. Please engage with the evidence provided.

Please don't tell me what to engage with.

Regardless of your evidence, you can get in trouble with BGA by naming names in these forums. You think I'm wrong about that? Check the site rules.

[ophum1234]

A cursory glance at the top players on arena would show you that the top two players have played 200 games.

It's not a false dilemma.
That means an unnecessary binary choice.
Try to understand the words you use before posting.
I have provided evidence in the thread and informed the moderators.
Your contribution is less than worthless.

A cursory glance at the top Arena player? So we take a look at the top Arena players and check how many games it says they've played on their game page. Let's start with #1, FluffyBunny7, with over 1000 total games of Quoridor. Now, even though 1000 starts with a 1, and 200 starts with a 2, 1000 is actually bigger than 200. So there went that claim.

#1's last game was before you made your post, so it's not like this wasn't true when you posted. But maybe you just didn't see #1, the reigning champion of the previous season. So #3 gets slipped in instead, LMrcx, with over 1600 games. Or maybe you missed them too. #4, SDFSDF has over 16000 games.

A false dilemma is not limited to two choices, lol. If someone says "you said it was a prime number so it's either 3 or 5", them later saying "or 7" won't change it from being a false dilemma. The point of the false dilemma is that it ruled out other viable options, not how many options it left open.

Cambridge distionary
Dilemma
a situation in which a difficult choice has to be made between two different things you could do

I never once posited any dilemma, real or false.
A false dilemma would involve my incorrectly positing a dilemma, as per your example. I didn't.

Again, try to understand the terminology you use before wasting my time. Basic literacy is important and it's not my job to educate you.

FluffyBunny and SDFSDF are clearly not cheating.

I have provided evidence of cheating in the thread. The fact you are incapable of engaging with that is your problem.
Please go somewhere else with your empty rhetoric and stop cluttering up this thread with nonsense and strawmen.

[ophum1234]

A cursory glance at the top players on arena would show you that the top two players have played 200 games.

It's not a false dilemma.
That means an unnecessary binary choice.
Try to understand the words you use before posting.
I have provided evidence in the thread and informed the moderators.
Your contribution is less than worthless.

A cursory glance at the top Arena player? So we take a look at the top Arena players and check how many games it says they've played on their game page. Let's start with #1, FluffyBunny7, with over 1000 total games of Quoridor. Now, even though 1000 starts with a 1, and 200 starts with a 2, 1000 is actually bigger than 200. So there went that claim.

#1's last game was before you made your post, so it's not like this wasn't true when you posted. But maybe you just didn't see #1, the reigning champion of the previous season. So #3 gets slipped in instead, LMrcx, with over 1600 games. Or maybe you missed them too. #4, SDFSDF has over 16000 games.

A false dilemma is not limited to two choices, lol. If someone says "you said it was a prime number so it's either 3 or 5", them later saying "or 7" won't change it from being a false dilemma. The point of the false dilemma is that it ruled out other viable options, not how many options it left open.

One of the players in the top ten has fewer than 200 games. One has fewer than 300. This is suspicious. I clearly wasn't referring to the rest of the players.

[ophum1234]

The problem is, if anyone from BGA sees your complaint here, you're going to get dinged for naming names.

You have said nothing substantive about the evidence I have provided. Please engage with the evidence provided.

Please don't tell me what to engage with.

Regardless of your evidence, you can get in trouble with BGA by naming names in these forums. You think I'm wrong about that? Check the site rules.

I'll say what I like, thanks. Your contribution is of no value. Please get off the thread if you have nothing useful to say.

[Ceaseless]

A cursory glance at the top players on arena would show you that the top two players have played 200 games.

It's not a false dilemma.
That means an unnecessary binary choice.
Try to understand the words you use before posting.
I have provided evidence in the thread and informed the moderators.
Your contribution is less than worthless.

A cursory glance at the top Arena player? So we take a look at the top Arena players and check how many games it says they've played on their game page. Let's start with #1, FluffyBunny7, with over 1000 total games of Quoridor. Now, even though 1000 starts with a 1, and 200 starts with a 2, 1000 is actually bigger than 200. So there went that claim.

#1's last game was before you made your post, so it's not like this wasn't true when you posted. But maybe you just didn't see #1, the reigning champion of the previous season. So #3 gets slipped in instead, LMrcx, with over 1600 games. Or maybe you missed them too. #4, SDFSDF has over 16000 games.

A false dilemma is not limited to two choices, lol. If someone says "you said it was a prime number so it's either 3 or 5", them later saying "or 7" won't change it from being a false dilemma. The point of the false dilemma is that it ruled out other viable options, not how many options it left open.

Cambridge distionary
Dilemma
a situation in which a difficult choice has to be made between two different things you could do

I never once posited any dilemma, real or false.
A false dilemma would involve my incorrectly positing a dilemma, as per your example. I didn't.

Again, try to understand the terminology you use before wasting my time. Basic literacy is important and it's not my job to educate you.

FluffyBunny and SDFSDF are clearly not cheating.

I have provided evidence of cheating in the thread. The fact you are incapable of engaging with that is your problem.
Please go somewhere else with your empty rhetoric and stop cluttering up this thread with nonsense and strawmen.

A false dilemma is posting a limited number of choices and hiding other possibilities. You making things up isn't going to work here.

A cursory glance at the top players on arena would show you that the top two players have played 200 games.

It's not a false dilemma.
That means an unnecessary binary choice.
Try to understand the words you use before posting.
I have provided evidence in the thread and informed the moderators.
Your contribution is less than worthless.

A cursory glance at the top Arena player? So we take a look at the top Arena players and check how many games it says they've played on their game page. Let's start with #1, FluffyBunny7, with over 1000 total games of Quoridor. Now, even though 1000 starts with a 1, and 200 starts with a 2, 1000 is actually bigger than 200. So there went that claim.

#1's last game was before you made your post, so it's not like this wasn't true when you posted. But maybe you just didn't see #1, the reigning champion of the previous season. So #3 gets slipped in instead, LMrcx, with over 1600 games. Or maybe you missed them too. #4, SDFSDF has over 16000 games.

A false dilemma is not limited to two choices, lol. If someone says "you said it was a prime number so it's either 3 or 5", them later saying "or 7" won't change it from being a false dilemma. The point of the false dilemma is that it ruled out other viable options, not how many options it left open.

One of the players in the top ten has fewer than 200 games. One has fewer than 300. This is suspicious. I clearly wasn't referring to the rest of the players.

You clearly stated the top 2 arena players. One moment the #1 Arena player is a cheater, the next they're clearly not. No wonder BGA banned public accusations of cheating with nonsense threads like this.

[Strode]

You have said nothing substantive about the evidence I have provided. Please engage with the evidence provided.

Please don't tell me what to engage with.

Regardless of your evidence, you can get in trouble with BGA by naming names in these forums. You think I'm wrong about that? Check the site rules.

I'll say what I like, thanks. Your contribution is of no value. Please get off the thread if you have nothing useful to say.

And I'll say what I want as well. Please don't create threads if you can't handle a little pushback.